Recently, a Toronto area JK- Grade 8 public school instituted a ban on balls in the playground because a parent had complained about having sustained a concussion from being hit in the head by a soccer ball. This incident received international attention, and was the butt of jokes on the David Letterman show and Saturday Night Live. The local hue and cry was loud and immediate. Children were shown on the nightly news, chanting, “We want our balls back!” The school board called a community meeting to discuss the issue. The upshot of that meeting was that only soft balls are allowed during school hours, and hard balls may only be used outside of school hours. Which begs the question: aren’t parents more likely to be in the playground outside of school hours?
We also found out that this ball ban had been on the table for quite some time, but was never enforced. The school has a very small play space, and all 350 students plus younger daycare student need to use it. One parent noted that if a big 14-year old lobbed a soccer ball at a little 4 year old, it could cause serious injury. While this is no doubt true, one wonders why this even crossed that parent’s mind, and why that’s the ball’s fault, and why the whole school should be punished for it. Perhaps the principal was worried that the parent was going to sue the school and/or school board for the injury, and (over)reacted with the ball ban.
What if a parent had been injured in a similar manner at a Sudbury school? First, a number of questions would be asked.
1. Was the ball kicked at the parent’s head deliberately?
2. Was the parent paying attention to what was going on around them in the school yard?
3. If not, did the parent accidentally and unknowingly step into the path of a flying ball?
4. Do adults realize that children do not have terribly good control of their aim when kicking, throwing, or hitting balls? After all, they’re still learning.
5. What happened after the parent was injured?
6. Was the student sorry? Was any apology offered?
7. Did the parent who was injured accept the apology, if offered?
8. What, if any, consequences were there for the student?9. What kinds of discussion were the students involved in after this incident came to light?10. Other than banning all “hard” balls (nerf balls are OK), what other safety measures were put into place?11. Were they needed, or what this an unfortunate accident?12. The kids got a petition going to bring balls back. Are they just thinking “we want our balls back” or are they also thinking “and this is what we will do to try to prevent future injuries”…?
13. Were the kids even allowed to be part of the discussion?
My now-18 year old son, who attended a Sudbury school for four years, offered his opinion: Sounds like the parent was unaware of what was going on around her. A Sudbury kid would take responsibility and apologize immediately. If the parent complained to a staff member, that staff member might put it on the agenda for the next SM, and it might or might not be taken up, depending on the circumstances. If it had been deliberate, they would have a serious talk with the student, through JC. If it had been an accident, people might just say, “Let’s be more careful and watch around us especially when parents are around to pick up their kids.”
Sudbury students and staff are expected to take personal responsibility, for our own actions and to keep ourselves safe. Blaming others and expecting safety to come from ill-considered or inappropriately enforced rules is not the standard at Sudbury schools. Rather, a full and frank discussion of the problem and possible solutions, informally or formally through Judicial Committee or School Meeting are the norm. And everyone has a voice. And parents have a role in setting a similar example at home.